— 
-
25.07.2011
RIA Novosti (digit.ru): Experts say that MegaFon subscribers should take legal action due to the SMS leak
"Major Internet and mobile phone operators are now active in entering the world markets. Therefore any violation on their part would entail a decrease in the value of their assets", reminds Vladimir Entin, Attorney of Klishin & Partners Attorneys at Law, thus inviting to look at the SMS leak issue from an unusual perspective.
-
09.06.2011
Pravо.ru: 129.6 million RUR recovery from Resad in favor of Stroytransgaz approved by Court of Appeals
Resad LLC, owner of the construction project of Molzhaninovka Gas-Turbine Thermal Power Plant in Moscow, represented by Klishin & Partners Attorneys at Law, and Stroytransgaz OJSC, controlled by businessman Gennady Timchenko, could not persuade Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeals to reverse the decision of Moscow Arbitration Court to recover 129.6 million RUR from the former in favor of the latter. 9th ACA dismissed the complaints of both companies.
Arbitration Court of Moscow made its award on 16 February. The amount awarded for recovery from Resad was unprecedentedly small — 1.5 billion RUR less than the amount claimed by Stroytransgaz (1.763 billion RUR).
-
07.06.2011
THEATER-GOER Magazine: Bolshoi patented its trademark
Bolshoi Theater’s trademark was acknowledged as famous by Russian Agency for Patents and Trademarks (Rospatent), according to Vladimir Entin, Director of Centre for Intellectual Property Legal Protection of Klishin & Partners Attorneys at Law, cited by Bolshoi’s website.
-
19.07.2011
RAPSI: Court decision to recover 82 million RUR in favor of Stroytransgaz appealed against by Resad
Federal Arbitration Court of Moscow Judicial District registered the cassation appeal from Resad LLC, the owner of the construction project of Molzhaninovka Gas-Turbine Power Plant in Moscow (represented by attorneys from Klishin & Partners Attorneys at Law), against the judicial acts of the lower court instances on the recovery of 82.032 million RUR in favor of Stroytransgaz OJSC headed by businessman Gennady Timchenko, said a Court employee in an interview with RAPSI correspondent.
-
06.06.2011
Hearing of the claim by Stroytransgaz OJSC to Resad LLC will take place on 8 June
The hearing of the claim by Stroytransgaz OJSC to Resad LLC (the latter represented by attorneys from Klishin & Partners Attorneys at Law) will take place at 4 p.m. on 8 June in Courtroom №203 of Moscow’s Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeals. The hearing will be chaired by Judge N.V.Degtyareva.
It is not improbable that this very hearing will address the issue of the construction expertise. Let us remind that on 12 May the Court invited the company to propose an institution which would agree to carry out such expertise.
-
06.06.2011
On 8 June the court will review the claim of Stroytransgz JSC against Resad LLC
06.06.2011
Initially the claimant asked the court to recover 1.763 billion RUR, but on 16 February the arbitration court satisfied the claim only in part. Moreover, the court of first instance dismissed Resad’s counterclaim for 703.6 million RUR (the claimed amount included an unspent advance payment with interest and damages).
Both the claimant and the respondent appealed against this decision.
On Wednesday the appeals instance postponed the hearing so that the parties could finalize the calculations related to their claims and itemize their positions in the dispute.
As follows from the case-related materials, the claims of Stroytransgaz are based on the construction contract dated 23 March 2009. In July 2010 Resad terminated the contract for the reason of the failure of Stroytransgaz to comply with the customer’s instructions and with the timescales for the execution of project documentation and supply of equipment. In its claim Stroytransgaz demands that Resad pays for the project documentation and the installation works. The initial claimed amount was 7.699 billion RUR, but was later lowered.
-
05.08.2011
MARKER: The Court made an arithmetic error when making its decision on Stroytransgaz’s claim to Resad
The Court ruled that the respondent must pay 129.7 million RUR, i.e. approximately 60 times less than the claimed amount. The initial amount of claim was almost 7.7 billion RUR, but later it was abated by the claimant to 1.76 billion RUR. The Court adjusted its decision. The Court decree of 21 March stated that it had made an arithmetic error when calculating the amounts to be recovered. As a result Resad now has to pay 82 million RUR instead of almost 130 million RUR.
-
05.08.2011
RAPSI (RIA Novosti): Recovery of 82 million RUR from the gas-turbine power plant construction project in favor of Stroytransgaz confirmed
Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeals upheld the decision to recover 82.032 million RUR from Resad LLC, owner of Molzhaninovka Gas Turbine Power Plant construction project in Moscow, claimed by Stroytransgaz OJSC headed by businessman Gennady Timchenko. This information was provided to RAPSI by the press relations service of Klishin & Partners Attorneys at Law, the representative of Resad in the Court.
-
09.06.2011
INTEFAX-AFI: The Court affirmed the decision to recover 82 million RUR from Resad in favor of Stroytransgaz
Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeals upheld on Wednesday the decision of Moscow Arbitration Court which had partly satisfied the claim from Stroytransgaz OJSC by deciding to recover 82 million RUR from Resad in February.
According to the press secretary of Klishin & Partners, the firm representing Resad LLC, the company will probably appeal against this decision in the cassation instance.
-
28.06.2011
Vladimir Entin: Things you need to know when reprinting articles from foreign press
The other law, i.e. the Law “On mass media” requires that a reference is made to the source of information. Apropos, such reference is not only gesture of courtesy towards colleagues. However, when dirty tricks which are called “election technologies” for some unknown reason become the order of the day, such guarantee of freedom may become a gold mine for black PR.
-
05.08.2010
Vladimir Entin: How can you protect your works published in the Web from illegal reprinting? Is it allowed to reprint articles from the Web without permission?
Materials that appear in the Internet are meant for distribution. If it were not so, they would be kept in strongboxes and given out against receipt. Information is usually reprinted for distribution purposes. Show the source of information and sleep well. When electronic versions of periodicals mention that a preliminary permission must be obtained for a reprint of any article therefrom, it means that this should be done. The issue seems to be closed.
-
01.09.2008
Newsru.com: ACCORDING TO THE FEDERATION COUNCIL, SAAKASHVILI MAY BE ARRESTED BY RUSSIA: HE HAS REASONS FOR STAYING IN GEORGIA
Alexey Klishin, member of the RF Federation Council, Deputy Chairman of the RFFC Committee for Legal and Judicial Matters, has put forward an initiative to apply the full set of measures of international legal prosecution against the leaders of Georgia. In the statement received by REGNUM the senator notes that it is legally feasible to bring those guilty in the deaths of the Russian peacekeepers and Russian nationals in South Ossetia to criminal liability under the internal laws of the Russian Federation and issue an international arrest warrant for them.
-
28.06.2011
Е. TSARAN: Inheritance certificate obtained half a century after the death of testator
Copyright inheritance is directly stipulated by Article 29 of the RF Law «On copyright and neighboring rights». It should be noted that the copyright to not only specific published or unpublished works are inherited, but to any and all works created by an author.
Under p. 1 of Article 9 of the foregoing Law, «copyright in a work of science, literature or the arts shall arise due to the fact of its production. There shall be no need to register or otherwise specially formalize the work or observe any other formalities for copyright therein to arise and be exercised.».